Brett Ratner will never wiggle his pest *ss out of the Epstein rat-trap, and here’s why...

Brett Ratner, the disgraced director of Rush Hour who ran to Israel to avoid prosecution after six women accused him of sexual misconduct in 2017 (the accusations ranged from verbal harassment to full-on forcing a victim to perform oral sex on him), crawled back into the limelight earlier this year with the Melania documentary.

Luckily for his victims, the boot-licking documentary isn’t the only thing Ratner has resurfaced in. The infamous Epstein Files offered quite a few interesting pictures of Brett Ratner that deserve a lot more publicity than they have received.

The first picture that began circulating is the one shown below:

The shirtless man Ratner’s hugging is Jean-Luc Brunel, a human trafficker, rapist of minors and one of Epstein’s closest buddies. Brunel owned a model agency that operated as a front used to traffic teenage models to creeps like Epstein. Since 1988, it was widely known that he allowed and encouraged the drug abuse and sexual exploitation of the models working for his agency.

Now, why would a man who claims the sexual assault allegations against him were not true associate with a well-known pimp, essentially? Ratner is still to make up an excuse for that.

The second picture is taken clearly on the same occasion, judging by Ratner’s facial hair and clothing. And it gets creepier.

He is seen right next to Epstein himself, cuddling a very young-looking woman.

This picture was shown to Ratner in an interview, prompting him to throw his ex-fiancée under the bus, claiming it was her who “dragged him to this party around 20 years ago”, where that picture was taken. The director claims he never had a personal relationship with Epstein before or after that and swears the girl he’s holding is his fiancée. Spoilers: he lied.

Now, around 20 years ago Brett Ratner was in his 30’s. In the 2000s he had three girlfriends: Rebecca Gayheart, Serena Williams and Alina Puscau (in chronological order). Serena can be excluded for obvious reasons (the girl in the picture is white).

Next potential match is Rebecca Gayheart, a model who would have been between 29 and 35 years old at the time the picture was taken. But the girl in the picture is pretty clearly not her. Back in the 90s and early 2000s, Rebecca was still sporting her signature lush perm, her hair was a mane of curls in pretty much every picture from that era:

I took it upon myself to find her pictures with a different hairstyle, and it is still much thicker than the hair of the girl in the picture, not to mention the differences in the hairline:

Moreover, back in 2000s, Rebecca still had noticeable “peach fuzz” on her forearms, which is visible in her pictures. Had the girl in the Epstein photo really been her, the hair would have created a slight discoloration in the forearm area, which is clearly not there.

The last possible match seems promising on the surface: Alina Puscau, a Romanian model and Epstein’s ex “girlfriend”, passed on to Ratner in 2006.

<Epstein Files, EFTA01713378.pdf>

The article in the files even mentions an engagement ring, so is she the “fiancée” in the picture? Nope!

Alina is a die-hard brunette, in the 2000s it was her go-to look.

I couldn’t find a single picture of her with blond hair at the time. Not to mention one little detail that straight-up proves she isn’t the girl in the picture.

Take a look at this:

That is a vaccination scar. A typical white spot every person born in the 80s and 90s in Eastern and South-Eastern Europe has on their left shoulder. The spot never tans, it never disappears and it will always be visible in pictures.

Lucky for us, the girl Ratner’s gripping has her left shoulder turned to the camera. And, as you can see:

That’s right, no vaccination scar.

This isn’t Brett Ratner’s fiancée. This is one of the trafficked teens fed to the creeps who are long overdue for their reunion with Brunel and Epstein in Hell.

And that’s not all I have for you! Remember the “never had any relations with Epstein” claim? Let’s take a closer look at that.

Below is a screen from the Epstein file EFTA00510191.pdf, which is a log of Epstein’s calendar notes.

Three scheduled meetings with Brett Ratner in 2018. A bit much for a person he claims to have no relation to, don’t you think?

Next, a number of e-mails Epstein received/sent:

Brett Ratner is not only sending Epstein his regards, he clearly arranges meetings for Epstein! No relations? Yeah, the files tell a different story.

Oh, and it gets worse!

The latest addition to Brett Ratner’s picture collection in the Epstein files is the most disturbing one to date:

This picture shows Ratner clearly on a different Epstein visit (he’s wearing different clothing). He is depicted on a bed, next to an unconscious girl that looks like a child. The girl’s skirt is dragged up, exposing her. I wonder what excuse that slimy creep will have for this one?

As you can see for yourself now, Brett Ratner was a sexual predator before and after the MeToo sexual assault allegations of 2017. This guy deserves the electric chair, not a Hollywood comeback. Please, spread the word, boycott his projects, make him crawl back into obscurity, where he belongs.

 

P.S.: And who would I be if I didn’t milk my favorite lolcow, Ms. Yi Zhou?

Yes, yes, she is a long-term buddy of Ratner and a fan of the MeToo movement. Which sounds weird, but I’ll try to explain it.

When Melania premiered in January, Zhou made 8 posts in support of Brett Ratner on her social media, positively gushing about how nice and protective he was towards her. She openly ignores the 2017 accusations, and part of me was still convinced she just didn’t know about the Epstein leaks.

So, I took it upon myself to post the aforementioned pictures in the comments to her supportive messages about Ratner on FB and X.

All Facebook comments were hidden/deleted within 24 hours of posting. She manages her pages herself. Zhou knows about these pictures and CHOOSES to ignore his victims.

This is a woman who sees the MeToo movement as her personal revenge tool. The only person she cares about is herself, and other victim stories are either ignored and dismissed, or exploited to give her own claims some much, much needed credibility. She will look the other way for a rapist depicted next to a drugged child in the Epstein Files. Remember this next time you hear her claims of being the “voice of victims”. She and Ratner really deserve each other.